I’m very taken with this photo comparison, as are many folks. I’ve poked around enough to know that the zoomed out shot of the square in Baghdad was available from Reuters all along. Why, then, were there news reports comparing this event to the fall of the Berlin Wall? Why was only the cropped shot published or streamed on TV? At what level did the deception take place?
Lucky for me, the New Yorker decided to take on the myth of Firdos Square last week. The article pretty decisively dismisses the circulating stories about the entire event being staged by US psychological operations teams. Rather than the government, it was the media that created the lie.
Primed for triumph, they were ready to latch onto a symbol of what they believed would be a joyous finale to the war. It was an unfortunate fusion: a preconception of what would happen, of what victory would look like, connected at Firdos Square with an aesthetically perfect representation of that preconception.
We’re all relatively accustomed to the myth-making that happens when history is reinterpreted with the benefit of hindsight. In the article, Wilson Surratt, senior executive producer in charge of CNN’s control room in Atlanta that day, says that “at some point, you’ve got to trust the viewer to understand what they’re seeing.” But should the viewer really have to ask whether they’re being shown a deliberately cropped frame that hides a dissonant context? The article’s author, Peter Maass, writes:
Propaganda has been a staple of warfare for ages, but the notion of creating events on the battlefield, as opposed to repackaging real ones after the fact, is a modern development.
And I would add, one that we’re not well equipped to protect ourselves from.
There is another question embedded in the article–about whether the event itself–as it really happened, not as it was falsely reported back home–was impacted by the presence of the media. Any of us who have ever smiled for a camera or cheered when the video swung our way know that the answer is yes. But the implications for responsible journalism are less obvious to me.
Thoughts?
Jonas