In an earlier comment, I wrote that:
we tend to view history through dual lenses of linearity and progress, forgetting that many of our greatest fights suffered deep, deep set-backs–even after we thought they were won. Given the turn in our nation’s politics as evidenced by last November’s elections, studying up on the South’s reversals after Reconstruction seems unfortunately timely.
I wasn’t expecting rape to be up for redefinition.
For those who missed the uproar this past week, House Republicans introduced the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, the aim of which is to ban federal funds from being used to subsidize abortions, with a few exceptions. While not a policy move I agree with, I can respect the effort.
The exceptions are the normal ones–incest, life of the woman is in danger, or forcible rape. Wait, what? Forcible rape, you say? What’s that?
Does that mean that statutory rape or coercive rape–when the victim is underage or unconscious or it can’t be proven that she fought back “quite hard enough”–are no longer always considered “real rape?”
Yep. But thanks to the quick response of many organizations and individuals from all over the country, the modifier on “rape” has been dropped from the bill. But the fact that it was up for debate at all is a wearying reminder of the non-linearity of progress.
Rape is defined by lack of consent. Period. We shouldn’t ever need to return to that discussion.
The effort by this bill’s authors to create a hierarchy of rape in their attempt to limit abortion is completely unacceptable.
Work on the legislation you feel like you need to work on, friends. But find another way to do it. This tactic is not ok now, and it never will be.
Jonas